Isn't It Ironic...
…that a virtual unknown, small-town, attractive woman is so well received as the potential next Vice President of our country while someone with the political background and experience had to fight tooth and nail to narrowly lose the nomination on the Democratic ticket? It’s not ironic to me. It’s society.
I rarely address political views, my own personal or otherwise in this medium but I can’t help but feel a little sorry for Hilary Clinton, and for the record I wasn’t one of her supporters. Many people, myself included, feel as though she rode Bill’s coat-tails to reach the political place she has, and maybe to a degree she did. But facts are facts, and Hilary Clinton is vastly more qualified to manage this country than Sarah Palin is, she’s just not as pretty.
I won’t bother with listing either woman’s qualifications (or lack therof) here but one tidbit sticks out in my mind, while Clinton was attending Wellesley College several of her classmates “thought she would be the first female President”—th at was 1969. Sarah Palin was voted “Miss Congeniality” and came in second in the Miss Alaska contest—pretty and a good personality, some girls have it all.
I don’t dislike Sarah Palin, that is not the point I’m trying to convey, I just feel like it’s very hard for us to teach our daughters and grand-daughters that you can be anything you want to be as long as you try hard enough. It’s clear that adage isn’t entirely true. Sadly, our society still puts more stock in ‘face’ value than they do hard work, determination and experience.
posted by: bawdy (reply)
post date: 09.06.08 (12:00 pm)
I really think you're over-simplifying the matter in this case. I'm sure Palin has a lot more going for her than looks and personality, and there is a difference between being the presidential candidate as opposed to the running mate. And Hilary isn't unattractive imho.
posted by: rosietulips (reply)
post date: 09.08.08 (1:23 pm)
I've always thought that people with better looks tended to have an advantage in many cases!
posted by: LadyG (reply)
post date: 09.09.08 (12:23 am)
It is a known fact that attractive people advance faster career wise then non attractive, sad but true.
posted by: FinalyFree (reply)
post date: 09.09.08 (8:32 am)
Reply to: bawdy
I guess I am over-simplifying things, but it's intentional. I realize Sarah Palin has some other things going for her but, what she lacks seems to be a lot easier to overlook because she's attractive (just the way I see things, lol). And I don't think Hilary is a bad looking lady either :)
posted by: FinalyFree (reply)
post date: 09.09.08 (8:33 am)
Reply to: rosietulips
Yep, me too! I think we've all seen it happen, huh?
posted by: FinalyFree (reply)
post date: 09.09.08 (8:34 am)
Reply to: LadyG
Very sad, especially when the stakes are as high as these are, huh?
posted by: PastorDave (reply)
post date: 09.26.08 (7:56 am)
As I watch Palin on tv, she comes across as "nice". She seems more like the person you truly interact with regularly in life. Hillary, although admittedly is more politically experienced and probably astute, certainly does not portray "nice". She's scary, even intimidating. I'm simply talking about such superficial qualities as appearance, voice, smile, "likability". It goes a long way in politics, the professional kind and the social version.
posted by: ggirl (reply)
post date: 09.30.08 (12:10 pm)
Sarah Palin is in over her head. Why couldn't John McCain find a more qualified Republican woman? There are certainly many of them who are not unattractive. Dumb mistake to choose someone who has so little experience when one of the biggest concerns about his potential presidency is the potential for dying in office.
Of course, that's just my opinion. Hope you're well and happy.

